Terraswap vs. Other DEXs Comparison Tool
Compare DEX Features
Select two DEXs to compare their key features side-by-side.
Comparison Results
Key Takeaways
- Terraswap is the pioneer AMM DEX on the Terra ecosystem, launched in 2020 by DELIGHT LABS.
- Since the Terra collapse in 2022, daily volume has fallen to near‑zero, making it a niche platform today.
- The protocol charges a flat 0.3% fee that goes directly to liquidity providers; there is no native governance token.
- Access requires the Terra Station Extension (Chrome only), which adds a usability hurdle for newcomers.
- Security audits are unclear - the team claims audits but external sources list none, so caution is advised.
Anyone searching for a Terraswap review wants to know whether the exchange still offers real value, how it works under the hood, and if the risks are worth taking. Below we break down the protocol’s history, technical design, current market data, user experience, and future outlook so you can decide if you should keep an eye on Terraswap or look elsewhere.
What Is Terraswap?
Terraswap is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Terra blockchain that uses an automated market‑maker (AMM) model to swap Terra‑native assets and custom CW20 tokens. Launched on November 13, 2020 by DELIGHT LABS - a team that also runs validator nodes for multiple networks - Terraswap was the first AMM DEX in the Terra ecosystem.
The platform’s core promise is “no custody, no middle‑man”: users keep control of their private keys, and every trade settles on‑chain through smart contracts.
How Terraswap Works
The engine behind Terraswap is an Automated Market Maker (AMM) protocol that creates liquidity pools for any two supported tokens. Liquidity providers (LPs) deposit equal‑value amounts of each token into a pool and receive LP tokens that represent their share.
Key technical pieces:
- All swaps follow the constant‑product formula (x*y=k), ensuring price slippage grows with trade size.
- Every trade incurs a flat 0.3% fee, which is automatically added back to the pool - effectively rewarding LPs.
- The protocol supports native Terra coins like Luna and the algorithmic stablecoin UST, as well as any CW20 token Terra’s equivalent of ERC‑20.
- New token pairs can be created by anyone; the contract auto‑listings mean there’s no manual vetting process.
Because the liquidity is supplied by the community, Terraswap does not issue a native governance token - the protocol’s utility is limited to swapping and earning pool fees.
Security, Audits, and Trust
Security is a major concern for any DEX. DELIGHT LABS claims that Terraswap’s smart contracts “were audited to eliminate vulnerabilities,” but independent sources such as DeFiTeller list **no published audit reports**. The lack of a publicly available audit creates uncertainty, especially given the Terra ecosystem’s turbulent history.
In practice, the protocol’s simplicity (a handful of immutable contracts) reduces the attack surface, but users should still:
- Verify contract addresses directly from the official Terraswap site.
- Avoid large, single‑transaction swaps that could expose price‑impact bugs.
- Consider only swapping tokens with known, audited codebases (e.g., Luna, UST, Mirror assets).

Current Activity and Market Data (Oct2025)
Terraswap’s activity has collapsed alongside the Terra ecosystem. As of October2025:
- Both the standard Terraswap and TerraswapClassic versions report **zero daily trading volume**.
- CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap label the exchange’s volume as “untracked,” indicating negligible activity.
- The platform lists 0 active trading pairs, essentially rendering it a dormant protocol.
These figures put Terraswap in the 4th percentile of DEX volume worldwide - far behind even niche platforms on thriving ecosystems.
User Experience and Accessibility
To interact with Terraswap you must use the Terra Station Extension a Chrome‑only wallet that connects your Terra address to the DEX. The extension adds several friction points:
- Browser lock‑in: only Google Chrome is supported, excluding Safari, Firefox, and mobile browsers.
- Learning curve: new users must install the extension, create a Terra address, and fund it with LUNA or UST before any swap.
- Network fees: each transaction pays the underlying Terra gas fee, which can spike during network congestion.
Because the platform lacks a web‑only “connect wallet” option, many modern DeFi users simply skip Terraswap in favor of DEXs that support MetaMask, WalletConnect, or other mainstream wallets.
How Terraswap Stacks Up Against Other DEXs
Feature | Terraswap | Uniswap | PancakeSwap |
---|---|---|---|
Underlying Chain | Terra (Classic) | Ethereum | Binance Smart Chain |
Launch Year | 2020 | 2018 | 2020 |
Swap Fee | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.25% |
Native Governance Token | None | UNI | CAKE |
Daily Volume (Oct2025) | $0 (untracked) | $2.1B | $1.3B |
Wallet Compatibility | Terra Station (Chrome) | MetaMask, WalletConnect, etc. | MetaMask, Trust Wallet, etc. |
From the table it’s clear that Terraswap lags dramatically in liquidity, user base, and ecosystem support. The lack of a governance token also means no incentive for community‑driven upgrades, unlike Uniswap’s UNI or PancakeSwap’s CAKE.
Pros and Cons
- Pros
- First‑mover AMM on Terra - historically a hub for stablecoins and synthetic assets.
- Flat 0.3% fee that goes entirely to LPs, no hidden costs.
- No native token to dilute value; pure utility focus.
- Cons
- Near‑zero trading volume makes slippage huge for any sizable trade.
- Only Chrome‑based Terra Station Extension is supported - a steep barrier for newcomers.
- Unclear audit status leaves security questions unanswered.
- Dependent on a struggling Terra ecosystem; recovery prospects are uncertain.
Future Outlook
Terraswap’s fate is tightly coupled with the Terra Classic network. If the community manages to revive Terra’s DeFi projects or migrates promising assets to a new chain, Terraswap could see a modest resurgence. However, the current ecosystem signals are bleak:
- Most Terra‑based projects have either shut down or migrated to other blockchains.
- DELIGHT LABS continues to run validators on unrelated networks, indicating they have shifted focus away from Terraswap’s growth.
- Without a governance token or clear upgrade roadmap, attracting new liquidity providers will be an uphill battle.
For users who already hold Terra‑native tokens and want to experiment with AMM mechanics, Terraswap remains a low‑cost sandbox. For anyone seeking active liquidity, competitive fees, and a vibrant community, platforms on Ethereum, BSC, or Polygon are safer bets.

Frequently Asked Questions
Is Terraswap still usable in 2025?
Yes, the smart contracts are still deployed and can be accessed via the Terra Station Extension, but trading volume is virtually nil, so expect high slippage and limited token pairs.
Do I need a native Terra token (LUNA) to use Terraswap?
You need some Terra‑compatible asset (LUNA, UST, or any CW20 token) to pay transaction fees and to provide liquidity. Without funds on Terra, the DEX cannot be used.
Has Terraswap been audited?
The team claims an audit took place, but reputable third‑party sources have not published any audit reports, so the claim remains unverified.
Can I earn rewards by providing liquidity?
Yes. Liquidity providers receive LP tokens that accrue a share of the 0.3% swap fee from that pool. There is no extra token incentive, only fee share.
How does Terraswap compare to Uniswap?
Uniswap operates on Ethereum with billions of dollars in daily volume, supports dozens of wallets, and has a governance token (UNI). Terraswap runs on Terra Classic, has near‑zero volume, supports only the Chrome‑based Terra Station, and has no governance token. Uniswap is vastly more liquid and user‑friendly.