Slippage Risk Calculator
Calculate potential price movement when trading on low-liquidity exchanges like MiaSwap v2. Based on data from article: $28 liquidity depth and 0.88% bid-ask spread.
Estimated Trading Impact
High RiskSlippage Percentage:
0.00%
Estimated Cost (USD):
$0.00
When you hear the name MiaSwap is a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange that supposedly launched in 2022 and claims a version 2 upgrade, the first thought is: does it actually work? Let’s break down the data, compare it with the big players, and see if you should even bother opening a wallet on this platform.
What is MiaSwap v2 supposed to be?
MiaSwap markets itself as a DEX that lets users swap tokens directly from their wallets, without a central order book. The site advertises a “v2” redesign, but there is no verifiable code, audit, or public roadmap. Unlike established exchanges, you won’t find a GitHub repo, a Telegram channel, or a Discord server with active members. The only concrete artifact is a brief listing on CoinGecko, which shows three tokens and four trading pairs.
Current activity & market data (as of October152025)
- Listed tokens: MIA, VNDC, plus two unnamed assets.
- 24‑hour volume: $36.13 - essentially dust compared with $1.2billion on Uniswap.
- Bid‑ask spread: 0.88% on the MIA/VNDC pair.
- Liquidity depth: only $28 at both +2% and -2% price points.
- Trust score on CoinGecko: 98.87% (the score is based on metadata completeness, not activity).
- Flag: "Inactive - No trades in the last 3 hours".
The MIA token trades around $0.0117 with virtually no price movement in the past 24hours and a -0.5% slide over seven days. The circulating supply isn’t published, so market‑cap calculations are unavailable.
How does MiaSwap stack up against the major DEXs?
| Metric | MiaSwap v2 | Uniswap | PancakeSwap | SushiSwap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launch year | 2022 | 2018 | 2020 | 2020 |
| Listed tokens | 3 | 4,500+ | 1,200+ | 800+ |
| Daily trade volume (USD) | $36 | $1.2B | $480M | $120M |
| Liquidity depth @±2% | $28 | $1.5B | $650M | $300M |
| Audit reports | None | Multiple (e.g., ConsenSys Diligence) | Multiple | Multiple |
| Yield farming/ incentives | None | Yes (Liquidity Mining) | Yes | Yes |
| Community channels | None found | Telegram, Discord, Reddit | Telegram, Discord | Telegram, Discord |
Even on raw numbers, MiaSwap is a drop in the ocean. The lack of audit reports and community channels alone should raise a red flag for anyone thinking about moving funds there.
Red flags and risk factors
- Inactivity. No trades recorded in the last three hours, and historically volume has hovered under $100 per day.
- Opacity. No smart‑contract addresses, no source code, no third‑party security audit.
- Liquidity vacuum. With only $28 of depth, a modest trade will move the price dramatically, exposing you to slippage and front‑running.
- Token data missing. Circulating supply, market cap, and holder distribution for the MIA token are unavailable.
- No documented fees. Users can’t tell whether they’ll pay a swap fee, a protocol fee, or hidden gas premiums.
- No community. Zero activity on Reddit, Twitter, or specialized crypto forums indicates no peer‑review or support network.
All of these points line up with what industry watchdogs consider a “dead” DEX. If a platform can’t prove it’s alive, it can’t be trusted.
Is there any reason to use MiaSwap?
Short answer: not really. The only scenario where you might consider it is if you hold MIA tokens that are locked to the platform and you need to withdraw them. Even then, it’s safer to use a trust‑wallet like MetaMask or Trust Wallet to interact directly with the token’s contract-assuming you can locate the contract address, which is currently hidden.
For a regular trader looking for price discovery, liquidity, or yield opportunities, the answer is a resounding “no.”
Alternative DEXs you can actually use
- Uniswap v3. Deep liquidity, audited contracts, and a vibrant developer community. Ideal for Ethereum‑based assets.
- PancakeSwap. Low fees on Binance Smart Chain and a robust yield‑farming ecosystem.
- SushiSwap. Multi‑chain support (Polygon, Avalanche, etc.) and plenty of incentives for liquidity providers.
- 1inch. Aggregator that finds the best price across multiple DEXs, handy when you need optimal slippage.
All of these platforms are listed on major data aggregators, have public audit reports, and show daily volumes in the millions-exactly the kind of environment where a trader can move money safely.
What do analysts say?
Even the most optimistic price‑prediction tools treat MIA as a stagnant asset. Coinbase projects a November2025 price of roughly $0.01, a 5% change from today’s level, which is essentially a flat line. The lack of any development roadmap means the token is unlikely to gain interest beyond speculative “hold‑until‑it‑dies” bets.
Bottom line for a potential user
If you’re scanning the crypto landscape for a new DEX, you’ll want depth, security, and community. MiaSwap v2 delivers none of those. The data tells a clear story: it’s inactive, unverified, and financially irrelevant. Stick with the established platforms, keep an eye on reputable audit reports, and avoid moving any meaningful capital onto a service that can’t even prove it exists.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is MiaSwap v2 currently operational?
No. The latest data from CoinGecko shows zero trades in the past three hours and a daily volume of only $36, indicating the platform is effectively dormant.
Can I safely trade the MIA token on MiaSwap?
Trading on MiaSwap is risky. With only $28 of liquidity depth, any modest order will cause extreme slippage, and there are no audited contracts to guarantee that swaps will execute correctly.
Where can I find the smart‑contract address for the MIA token?
The contract address is not publicly listed on the MiaSwap site or on major explorers. You would need to locate it through a blockchain explorer by searching for a transaction involving the token, but the lack of documentation makes this impractical.
How does MiaSwap’s fee structure compare to Uniswap?
MiaSwap does not publish any fee schedule, whereas Uniswap v3 charges a standard 0.05%‑0.30% fee that is transparent and adjustable per pool. The unknown fees on MiaSwap add another layer of uncertainty.
Should I consider migrating any MIA holdings to a larger DEX?
If you own MIA tokens, the best move is to hold them in a private wallet (MetaMask, Trust Wallet) and wait for a legitimate listing on a major DEX. Trying to swap on MiaSwap will likely cost more in slippage than the token’s value.
Isabelle Graf
October 15, 2025 AT 09:33Honestly, ditching dead DEXs like MiaSwap is the only morally decent thing to do.
Millsaps Crista
October 15, 2025 AT 10:56Look, if you want a real trading experience, stick to Uniswap or PancakeSwap. Those platforms have depth, audits, and active communities, so you won’t waste time on a dead street‑corner exchange. Push your capital where it matters.
Shane Lunan
October 15, 2025 AT 12:20MiaSwap looks like a joke nobody posted about and it barely moves any volume.
Jeff Moric
October 15, 2025 AT 13:43I get why people check it out, but the data says it’s inactive and unsafe. Use a platform with a track record, and keep your tokens in a wallet you control.
Bruce Safford
October 15, 2025 AT 15:06Okay, let me break this down for the curious crowd that thinks “small liquidity = hidden treasure”. First, the $28 depth means any trade bigger than a latte will swing the price like a pendulum in a cheap clock. Second, there is absolutely no public contract address – you’re forced to guess or hope the devs will post it later, which in crypto speak is the same as "maybe never". Third, the audit? Nada. Zero. That’s a red flag bigger than the Union Jack on a pirate ship. Fourth, the community is a ghost town. No Telegram, Discord, Reddit, nothing. That’s the kind of silence that whisperers in conspiracies love – because when there’s nothing to see, they fill the void with their own narratives. Fifth, the token data is missing – circulation, holder distribution, market‑cap – all the core metrics that let you size up risk. Sixth, the fee structure is invisible, meaning you could be paying a 10% hidden fee on top of slippage. Seventh, the platform’s UI looks like a low‑budget copy of Uniswap’s landing page, but with broken scripts and placeholder text left over from a template. Eighth, the site’s “risk badge” is flashing red like a warning light on a car that’s about to break down – and it actually is. Ninth, their claim of a “v2 upgrade” is unsupported by any code repository. If you can’t verify the upgrade, you can’t trust it. Tenth, the CoinGecko trust score of 98.87% is misleading; it’s based on metadata, not activity. Eleventh, the last trade time is three hours ago – which for a DEX that should be 24/7 is basically “offline”. Twelfth, the bid‑ask spread of 0.88% looks decent until you realize the volume is $36 a day; that spread is meaningless at that size. Thirteenth, any front‑runner can swoop in, see a pending transaction, and dump the price before yours fills. Fourteenth, the platform has no liquidity protection – you could lose half your position before the transaction settles. Fifteenth, the entire ecosystem feels like a meme that never got a punchline. Bottom line: it’s a perfect storm of opacity, inactivity, and risk – avoid it like the plague.
Wayne Sternberger
October 15, 2025 AT 16:30While the analysis is thorough, I’d suggest focusing on securing your assets in a reputable wallet. Even if you eventually need to interact with the token, using MetaMask directly with the verified contract address (once found) is safer than trusting a shady interface.
Gautam Negi
October 15, 2025 AT 17:53From an academic perspective, the paucity of data on MiaSwap v2 makes it an intriguing case study of market failure. Yet, as a participant, you are better served by platforms where price discovery mechanisms are proven.
Mitch Graci
October 15, 2025 AT 19:16Oh sure, because everyone just loves tossing money into an X‑ray visionless black hole!!! Seriously – the slippage is astronomically high, the fees are a mystery, and the whole thing screams "pump and dump". 🙄🙄🙄
Jazmin Duthie
October 15, 2025 AT 20:40Right, because spending $30 on a dead exchange is the new hobby trend.
Michael Grima
October 15, 2025 AT 22:03Trading on MiaSwap is like ordering a mystery pizza: you might get cheese, you might get a cardboard box.
DeAnna Greenhaw
October 15, 2025 AT 23:26One must, with the utmost decorum, contemplate the profound futility inherent in the enterprise known as MiaSwap v2. The platform, bereft of any discernible liquidity, operates in a vacuum wherein the very notion of price discovery is rendered a mere abstraction. Its purported "v2" moniker conjures expectations of evolutionary advancement, yet it offers naught but a barren landscape devoid of audits, community engagement, or even a solipsistic token‑contract address. To the diligent investor, this manifests as a veritable quagmire of risk-slippage that would make a seasoned trader weep, opaque fee structures that conceal fiscal expropriation, and an operational silence that would alarm even the most stoic of on‑chain analysts. Moreover, the tokenomics remain shrouded in secrecy; without circulating supply figures, market‑cap calculations descend into conjecture. Consequently, any capital allocated to such an environment is tantamount to a philanthropic donation to an anonymous, invisible entity. In summation, the judicious course of action is to eschew this derelict exchange in favor of established, audited, and community‑vetted platforms wherein transparency and liquidity coalesce to safeguard participants.
Teagan Beck
October 16, 2025 AT 00:50Sounds fancy, but just use Uniswap.
Kim Evans
October 16, 2025 AT 02:13Pro tip: If you somehow find the MIA contract address, pull the token into MetaMask and trade on a big DEX like Uniswap. That way you avoid the mystery fees and slippage. 👍
Jennifer Bursey
October 16, 2025 AT 03:36From a risk‑management standpoint, the liquidity‑to‑trade‑size ratio is a key KPI. Here, the ratio is essentially 1:∞, meaning any sizable order will suffer catastrophic price impact. Coupled with the absence of an audit, you have a classic high‑risk, low‑reward scenario. Therefore, the prudent strategy is to allocate zero exposure to MiaSwap and redirect resources to liquidity‑rich aggregators.
Maureen Ruiz-Sundstrom
October 16, 2025 AT 05:00In the grand tapestry of decentralized finance, MiaSwap represents a thread so thin it barely registers on the loom. One could argue that its existence is a philosophical statement on the futility of trust without verification. Yet, for the pragmatic trader, this translates to inevitable loss. Hence, the only rational choice is abstention.
Kevin Duffy
October 16, 2025 AT 06:23Stay positive! There are plenty of legit DEXs out there where your trades won’t evaporate. 🚀
Maria Rita
October 16, 2025 AT 07:46Don’t get discouraged – the crypto world is full of gems. Keep your eyes on reputable platforms and you’ll find the right spot to grow your portfolio.
Cynthia Chiang
October 16, 2025 AT 09:10Honestly, the safest bet is to just hold your MIA in a personal wallet and wait for a proper listing. Trying to trade on this dead site is just a waste of time and gas.
Hari Chamlagai
October 16, 2025 AT 10:33It’s obvious the creators are hiding something – no code, no community, no transparency. Avoid at all costs.
Jim Greene
October 16, 2025 AT 11:56Keep looking for solid DEXs – the right one is out there! 😊