China officially banned cryptocurrency in 2021. No exchanges. No mining. No trading. Yet, 59 million Chinese people are still using crypto today. Thatâs more than the entire population of Canada. How is that possible?
They Didnât Stop Using It - They Just Went Dark
The Chinese government didnât just warn people away from Bitcoin. They shut down every exchange operating inside the country. They blocked websites. They fined banks that even looked the other way. By September 2021, owning or trading crypto was illegal. At least, thatâs what the law says. But laws donât stop people who have a reason to use something. For many Chinese, crypto isnât about speculation - itâs about survival. Sending money to family abroad? Traditional banks charge 5-7% in fees and take days. Using USDT (Tether) on a peer-to-peer platform? 15 minutes. Less than 1% in fees. Thatâs why stablecoins now make up nearly 40% of all crypto transactions in China, up from just 22% in 2024.How Do They Do It? The Underground Network
You wonât find a crypto app on the official Chinese app stores. But if you know where to look, youâll find them. Apps like CryptoBridge and Silk Road Wallet arenât on Google Play or Appleâs App Store. Theyâre on third-party Android stores, downloaded over 8.7 million times in the first half of 2025. Users install them manually, often through QR codes shared in WeChat groups. Most Chinese crypto users access offshore exchanges like Binance, Bybit, or OKX through VPNs. About 78% use them, according to Chainalysis. Itâs not perfect - connections drop, servers get blocked - but it works. And when the internet gets too hot, they switch to P2P trading. Peer-to-peer trading is the backbone of Chinaâs crypto underground. Instead of using an exchange, buyers and sellers connect directly. They use WeChat or QQ to negotiate. Escrow services hold the money until both sides confirm the trade. Around 63% of all crypto transactions in China happen this way. And 45% of those P2P trades are done through encrypted WeChat groups that use coded language - âgreen teaâ for Bitcoin, âred packetâ for USDT - to avoid detection.The e-CNY Paradox
While cracking down on Bitcoin and Ethereum, China is pushing its own digital currency: the e-CNY, or digital yuan. The Peopleâs Bank of China has rolled out over 260 million individual wallets and 15.5 million corporate ones. By mid-2025, civil servants in pilot cities like Shanghai and Shenzhen are getting paid in e-CNY. You can use it to pay for subway rides, phone bills, even hospital fees. Itâs a clear signal: the government wants control. The e-CNY is fully traceable. Every transaction is logged. No anonymity. No privacy. And thatâs the point. But hereâs the irony: the more the government pushes the e-CNY, the more people turn to crypto. Why? Because crypto is the only way to move money outside Chinaâs surveillance system. The e-CNY locks you in. Bitcoin lets you escape.
Whoâs Using It? Young, Tech-Savvy, and Fed Up
Itâs not the elderly. Itâs not the middle class sitting on savings. Itâs young people - mostly men under 35. Nearly 38% of Chinese crypto users are between 25 and 34. Thatâs higher than anywhere else in the world. Meanwhile, users over 45 make up just 12.8% of the market, compared to 22% globally. And while 89% of users are male, that gap is shrinking. More women are joining, especially those working in tech or with family abroad. Theyâre not gambling. Theyâre protecting value. Sending money home. Avoiding inflation. One user on Zhihu, Chinaâs version of Reddit, wrote: âI use USDT to pay my daughterâs tuition in Australia. The bank wanted $1,200 in fees. I paid $15 in crypto. It arrived in 12 minutes.â Thatâs the real story.The Risks Are Real - But People Keep Going
Itâs not safe. In April 2025, a Reddit survey from r/CryptoChina found that 68% of users had their bank accounts frozen because of crypto activity. The average loss? 23,500 yuan - about $3,250. Some lost everything. Scams are rampant. The China Cybersecurity Association reported $165 million lost to crypto fraud in just the first quarter of 2025. Fake P2P platforms. Fake wallet apps. Fake âguaranteed returns.â Yet 82% of users said they kept trading. And 45% increased their investment compared to 2024. Why? Because the alternatives are worse. Capital controls limit how much money you can take out of China. The yuan is losing value. Inflation is creeping up. And the government doesnât trust its own financial system. So people trust code instead.
Rishav Ranjan
December 22, 2025 AT 04:27Wow. So what?
Naman Modi
December 22, 2025 AT 19:24China bans crypto? Big deal. People always find a way. đ
Shubham Singh
December 23, 2025 AT 17:16One must admire the sheer audacity of a population that treats state prohibition as a mere technical glitch. The e-CNY is not a currency-it is a surveillance ledger with a user interface. Meanwhile, USDT operates like a silent protest in code. The state fears what it cannot control. And so, it tries to ban it. How quaint.
Dustin Bright
December 24, 2025 AT 12:27Bro. My cousin in Shenzhen uses crypto to send money to his mom in rural Henan. She doesnât even know what blockchain is. She just gets the cash. đ€
Sheila Ayu
December 25, 2025 AT 12:16Wait-so youâre telling me people are using WECHAT to trade Bitcoin? And they call it âgreen teaâ?!?!?!!? Thatâs not underground-thatâs a TikTok trend with a blockchain twist!!
And donât even get me started on âred packetâ for USDT-next theyâll be calling Dogecoin âdumpling moneyâ and calling Ethereum âdragon fruitâ!!
Who wrote this article? A marketing intern who binge-watched Netflixâs âDarkâ and then tried to write a Forbes op-ed after three Red Bulls??
Also, 59 million people? Thatâs more than the entire population of Canada??? So⊠what? Theyâre all just sitting around typing âgreen teaâ into WeChat at 3 a.m.???
And the fact that 89% are male? Thatâs not a crypto stat-thatâs a Tinder profile statistic. Whoâs even left to do the laundry??
Also-did you mention inflation? Yes. Did you mention how the yuanâs losing value? Yes. But did you mention that the Chinese government is literally printing more money to fund its own infrastructure projects? Yes. But you didnât say that crypto is just a symptom, not the disease.
And what about the 68% whose bank accounts got frozen? Whereâs their story? Whereâs the human cost? You turned this into a tech fantasy novel with bullet points.
And Hong Kong? Ohhhhh, Hong Kong!! The âcrypto hubâ?? Thatâs like saying âthe back alley behind the gas station is the new Michelin-starred restaurantâ because someone sold a burrito there.
And Bernsteinâs â65% chanceâ? Thatâs not a prediction-thatâs a fortune cookie. Who even is Bernstein? Is that a hedge fund or a guy who sells yoga mats on Amazon?
And the final line-âone USDT at a timeâ? Thatâs not poetic. Thatâs a bad Instagram caption.
Also-why is no one talking about how this entire underground economy relies on people risking jail time, bank freezes, and family shame to send money to their sister in Canada???
So⊠yeah. Cool story. But whereâs the soul?
Helen Pieracacos
December 25, 2025 AT 20:06Wow. So the government bans crypto⊠and people use it anyway. Groundbreaking. đ
Ashley Lewis
December 26, 2025 AT 12:27It is not surprising that a nation with such rigid control over its populace would witness such a desperate, unregulated response. The fact that citizens must resort to encrypted slang and VPN tunnels to perform basic financial transactions speaks not to innovation, but to systemic failure. This is not resistance. It is survival in a digital police state.
vaibhav pushilkar
December 27, 2025 AT 09:09Actually, the P2P model in China is brilliant. No middlemen, no fees, no delays. Itâs like the original internet-peer-to-peer, decentralized, human. The government can block websites, but they canât block trust between two people.
Lloyd Yang
December 28, 2025 AT 21:46Let me tell you something-this isnât just about money. Itâs about dignity. Imagine being told you canât send your daughterâs tuition abroad without paying a 7% fee and waiting a week. Then you find out you can do it in 12 minutes for $15 using a phone app no oneâs supposed to know exists. Thatâs not crypto. Thatâs liberation. Thatâs a mother choosing her childâs future over a bureaucratic nightmare. And yeah, itâs risky. But so is trusting a bank thatâs owned by a government that watches every penny you make. The e-CNY isnât progress-itâs a leash. Crypto? Itâs the only thing left that still lets you breathe.
And the women? Oh, theyâre not just joining-theyâre leading. Quietly. Smartly. They donât need to shout about decentralization. They just need to pay the bills. And theyâre doing it better than anyone else.
The real revolution isnât in the code. Itâs in the WeChat group where a 28-year-old nurse in Chengdu teaches her mom how to scan a QR code for âred packetâ so her brother in Toronto can get his rent money. No form. No ID. No permission. Just love, encrypted.
Theyâre not rebels. Theyâre realists. And the world needs to stop calling it âunderground.â Itâs just⊠life. In 2025. In China.
And yeah-some people get caught. Some lose everything. But they still come back. Because what choice do they have? The systemâs rigged. So they built their own.
And honestly? Thatâs the most human thing Iâve read all year.
Charles Freitas
December 30, 2025 AT 12:25Oh, so now itâs âhuman ingenuityâ? Let me guess-the same âingenuityâ that got 68% of these people their bank accounts frozen? The same âingenuityâ that led to $165 million in scams? The same âingenuityâ that makes people trust strangers on WeChat with their life savings? No. This isnât innovation. Itâs desperation dressed up as a TED Talk. You donât get to romanticize financial chaos just because itâs convenient.
And letâs not pretend this isnât a massive tax evasion scheme. The governmentâs not âfailingâ-theyâre trying to stop people from laundering money, hiding assets, and dodging capital controls. And you? Youâre cheering for it like itâs some kind of Robin Hood heist.
Itâs not. Itâs a mess. And itâs going to end badly.
Jacob Lawrenson
January 1, 2026 AT 03:29YESSSSSS!!! This is the future!!! đđ„
Imagine: a world where your money doesnât need permission to move. Where your sister in Canada gets cash in 12 minutes. No banks. No bureaucracy. Just you, your phone, and a little bit of courage.
Chinaâs not breaking the rules-theyâre rewriting them. And honestly? Iâm jealous. Weâre still arguing about whether crypto is âreal moneyâ while theyâre already using it to pay for college.
Also-green tea for BTC?? Iâm buying that merch. đ«đ°
Sarah Glaser
January 1, 2026 AT 19:59There is a profound cultural paradox here: the worldâs most centralized state is inadvertently fostering the worldâs most decentralized financial underground. This is not merely evasion-it is the birth of a new social contract, forged not in legislation, but in necessity. The Chinese people, through quiet, collective action, have redefined sovereignty: not as control from above, but as autonomy from below. The e-CNY may be the instrument of the state, but USDT is the instrument of the people. And in that tension lies the future of global finance.
Grace Simmons
January 2, 2026 AT 22:23Letâs not glorify this. This is illegal activity by millions of people. You donât get to call it âresilienceâ when itâs breaking the law. The Chinese government has every right to control its financial system. This isnât âfreedomâ-itâs a loophole. And loopholes get closed. Eventually.
And donât act like the U.S. or EU are saints. Weâve got our own capital controls, our own surveillance, our own banks that charge 5% for wire transfers. But we donât turn to black markets. We fix the system. Not bypass it.
Steve B
January 4, 2026 AT 12:09One wonders whether the persistence of crypto in China is not a triumph of technology, but a symptom of a deeper malaise-a society where trust in institutions has been so thoroughly eroded that citizens must turn to unregulated digital artifacts to preserve even the most basic human functions: familial care, economic dignity, intergenerational survival. The blockchain, in this context, is not a tool-it is a tombstone for the social contract.
SHEFFIN ANTONY
January 6, 2026 AT 00:16Wait-so youâre saying 59 million people are breaking the law⊠and youâre calling it âhuman ingenuityâ??
Thatâs not genius. Thatâs a national emergency.
And âgreen teaâ for Bitcoin?? Thatâs not clever-thatâs cringe.
Also, why is every single user under 35? Are the older generations just⊠sitting around waiting to die? Or did they figure out that crypto is a scam?
And the fact that 89% are male?? Thatâs not a crypto stat-thatâs a dating app stat. Whoâs raising the kids??
And Hong Kong?? Ohhh, so now itâs âHong Kongâ??
Chinaâs not âsoftening.â Theyâre just letting people get caught first. Then theyâll make an example of them.
And âBernsteinâs 65% chanceâ? Thatâs not analysis. Thatâs a casino bet.
This article reads like a Silicon Valley pitch deck written by someone whoâs never met a Chinese person.
Craig Fraser
January 7, 2026 AT 13:52Itâs amusing how Western commentators treat this as some kind of romantic rebellion. Itâs not. Itâs a dysfunctional financial system with a workaround. The government is not âparanoid.â Itâs protecting its monetary authority. The fact that people are risking jail time to avoid paying a 7% fee doesnât make them heroes-it makes them reckless. And the idea that this is âthe futureâ is delusional. The future is regulation. Not chaos.
Lloyd Yang
January 7, 2026 AT 15:14Youâre right-itâs not about freedom. Itâs about function. But function is what freedom looks like when youâre locked out of the system. You call it âreckless.â I call it resourceful. You call it âchaos.â I call it community. You call it âbreaking the law.â I call it surviving a system that doesnât serve you. The state can freeze accounts. But it canât freeze love. And it canât stop a mother from sending her daughterâs tuition in 12 minutes for $15. Thatâs not a loophole. Thatâs a lifeline.
And yeah-some people get scammed. Some lose everything. But they still come back. Because the alternative is worse. And if youâve never had to choose between paying rent and sending money home, maybe you shouldnât be the one judging.